I’m undertaking a project that might end up costing me my job.
I helped start Dash Force News because there was a large coverage gap for Dash in the crypto news world. I joined up to get the truth out, and I’m very proud of our work so far. I’m not satisfied, though. Our coverage has been great, but surface-level. Positive. Safe. Most of the time, this is exactly what’s needed. Sometimes, we need to go deep and uncover some ugly stuff. To that end, I will begin doing deep investigative journalism pieces about the Dash ecosystem, usually focused on treasury proposals and the various organizations in the network that they help fund.
This will get uncomfortable fast, as true accountability means asking the toughest questions and uncovering the deepest secrets, some of whom may have the end result of making someone lose their funding, and therefore potentially their livelihood. This opens us up to counterattack, and in the Dash network you never know who could be a masternode owner, just itching to downvote your proposal to oblivion if you dare to cross theirs. I might make a lot of enemies, some out of former friends. That might mean that, down the line, my ability to work full-time for Dash may be put at risk. That’s fine. I think this service is crucially needed, for several reasons.
The Dash community is “too nice,” defensive against outside attacks
From my time working for, and defending, Dash I’ve noticed two key things. First, the community is very nice, sweet, positive, and patient. This is because of many factors, but I think it’s fair to say that it’s partly a reaction to the outright hostility prevalent in the Bitcoin world and throughout much of the cryptospace. This is one of Dash’s defining features, but as a drawback you get a lot of people who are afraid to rock the boat. 90% of the time, the “Dash way” of relentless positivity is absolutely the right move. I’m here to help deliver some much-needed scrutiny for the other 10% of times.
Second, almost since its inception, Dash has been under constant attack from communities of rival coins. I’ve personally spent countless hours online, countering lies and misconceptions, educating, and straight up calling out trolls. I’ve seen the network survive DDoS attacks, as well as several sites I’ve written for. I see how every single Dash article that shows up in the Cryptocurrency subreddit gets downvoted to zero by jealous trolls. This has made the community very wary of outside attacks, and very protective over any weakness, shortcoming, or vulnerability in the Dash ecosystem. The time for that level of defensiveness, in my opinion, is over. Dash is strong enough to have near inevitable success, and we need not fear a little accountability. It will only make us stronger. Dash stands on its own merits.
Masternodes have little info, even less time, to go on
There are potentially thousands of masternode operators who must vote on scores of proposals every month. None of them have the necessary information to do their due diligence in researching all the various arms of the Dash network, asking hard questions, cross-referencing, and coming to an accurate conclusion. In many cases, this much work isn’t needed, as many proposal owners are forthcoming and straightforward, and some projects such as Dash Force have a very public record of work and simple bookkeeping. However, there are plenty of cases where some very good projects can avoid disclosing invaluable information, and terrible projects are free to scam the network as long as their pitch, figures, and pictures sound good at first glance. Masternodes need a bulldog to do their dirty work and hunt down the truth no matter how distasteful. In truth, the masternodes need many such individuals, but we might as well start with one.
This will ultimately help Dash go #tothemoon
The best movement is battle-hardened, the best product is rigorously tested and broken over and over, and the best organizations are those that live under constant threat of their darkest secrets being exposed to the general public. Dash is doing great right now. Imagine how well it’ll do when it truly puts its best foot forward.
I will do my best. Yes, there is personal risk to reputation and finances involved, but I’m not worried. Ultimately, this will make the Dash network a more thriving, accountable, and airtight movement, the likes of which cannot be stopped. That’s something the world needs far more than I need my job stability.
I hope that people will be able to tolerate a bit o discomfort. You’re right, when anyone considers anything they need both very well thought out pros and equally well thought out and honest cons. Sometimes the cons are more important to deeply investigate and understand than the pros. Focus too much on the good and not consider enough about the bad, and the bad things will always take you by surprise. Both need equal footing and weight in order to make the best decisions about the network and system as a whole. You want the best system, then you capitalize on the good, and learn how to best mitigate or deal with the bad.
I say good luck to your endeavors, and to others I hope they understand it is really done with the best intentions to help out the entire network of Dash.
That’s why I preface everything with this article: so there can be no doubt.
Totally needed. Thank you. Dash nation really needs to be a little more aggressive. The PR game has been too conciliatory and meek. Lets stop pretending that Dash is not better than bitcoin.
Yes, true, but that’s not precisely what I was talking about here. I meant that I will be doing internal investigations that might make some in the Dash community uncomfortable.
I doubt that the masternode network would cutoff funding for true investigative journalism. It needs to be done, even if dirty laundry gets aired, and even if some of that dirty laundry is my own. It seems to me that the network is hungry for the truth, and feels generally slighted by both core (we’re taking steps) and proposal winners who aren’t delivering on their promises (some taking better steps than others). Understanding the grievances, and discussing potential solutions are valuable. I suppose some individuals may occupy more than 1 of the related roles (masternode owner, core team member, proposal winner, community member), and this seems to be the (very valid) source of your concern.
If so, I would encourage both you (author) and this audience (you, reader) to focus on the value of discovering and resolving issues, rather than sensationalistic blame games, hear-say, slander, and libel. If you can pull this off with your character and integrity intact, then you will have earned it, and I would personally donate to such a cause.
Thanks, though I’m not looking for any donations for this. I’m just doing my job, the one I already agreed to do for the network, though in a more intense capacity.
Information is a tool that can be used for a variety of purposes. I aim to provide a tool. Anyone can use it in whatever sensationalist, or prudent, manner they wish. The challenge is people often ascribe motives and subjectivity to the objective pursuit of information. IMHO the community shouldn’t shy away from simple information gathering.
” this service is crucially needed” – High time IMO. I’ve always found all the rah rah very worrying – a sign of weakness and also dangerous to Dash (hiding/not discussing flaws). You will definitely get a lot of hate, but stick with a it – Dash needs a free press with balls
I don’t think you, or I should say We, have too much to worry about. But like we talked about in our meeting, anything is possible, including the defunding of Dash Force. So the whole Dash Force team is on the line.
Myself and Mark both support your investigative journalistic adventures but people should also know that does not mean we will all agree on everything. Masternode owners should remember this too and not vote against Dash Force because of what one member says when the whole rest of the team might disagree with said individual.
I have held off doing my long planned proposal review podcast for fear it would only work against Dash Force and piss off a bunch of proposal owners who may also be masternode owners. I’m going to move forward with that project now and try to shine a light on things from that angle too. There will be plenty of familiar faces dropping by and some special guest too!
Too NICE indeed. The whole “Charlie Shrem debacle” REALLY made me
annoyed at how when they FINALLY got a hold of him, they were afraid to
broach the subject at hand. In my case the proposal fee is indeed a
hurdle, it seems as though this guy got funded on reputation alone which
in my opinion was shady to begin with. ASK the HARD QUESTIONS by all
means, in order for the flaws to be corrected. In my opinion, DASH has
the ability if run correctly to create its own economy within the
crypto-space which will allow for mass adoption based truly being an
alternative to a failed fiat system.