Bitcoin is coming to a chain split. Every passing second brings us closer to the moment when a second coin, Bitcoin Cash, will diverge from the main chain, allowing all the big block originalists to have their way while the rest of users can have another way. However, this isn’t just a case of a new coin being made. Something unprecedented is happening that will change the whole landscape of the cryptocurrency universe, never to be the same again.
Bitcoin thrived on “originalism”
The one great selling point of Bitcoin is that it was the first. It had the vision for peer-to-peer money, it had solid design and proven use cases. In short, it worked. What Bitcoin did was debut a workable model for blockchain technology that was solid, practical, and, from a certain point of view, flawless. One reason why so many have been hesitant to deploy any major changes over the past near-decade of its existence has been the fear of upsetting the mystical balance of Satoshi’s perfection. In other words, “We got it right the first time, don’t mess it up with useless experiments.”
Other coins were the experiments
Once Bitcoin successfully proved that blockchain technology could change the world, users naturally began to think of what else it could do, as well as how it could be improved. But rather than mess with the original coin and risk ruining everything, experiments were conducted on other chains. Now, hundreds of coins exist to serve every manner of potential use, from minor tweaks to the original model like block size/interval changes and mining and distribution differences to major overhauls of the coin’s anonymity features and governance system. But the thought behind all this was: “Let’s experiment on other coins, because they’re expendable. Bitcoin is not.”
With Bitcoin, everyone was supposed to agree
As long as it has had users, Bitcoin has had disagreements within its community as to its developmental direction. However, the rule, spoken or otherwise, was that we all had to agree in the end. We could all have our favorite altcoin and argue which was better as a hobby, but when it came to business Bitcoin was our first love. Whatever separate conclusions we came to in theory, in practice we needed to be on the same page with Bitcoin. That’s why so many fought for so long over its destiny rather than simply create (or migrate to) a new coin to have their way: Bitcoin was the real deal where we all were supposed to come together with a unified vision.
Both new Bitcoins have an element of change
Now, with the impending chain split, that pure originalism is lost on both chains. Bitcoin Cash remains the more “old school” choice with only a block size increase as a change from the original design (though still in line with the original vision), but has lost most of the network effects long maintained by the original chain, and, most importantly, has lost the most important aspect of that originalism: the name. The “legitimate” inheritor of the Bitcoin branding maintains the name and the network effects, but will fundamentally change how the data is stored in blocks and will transition to more of a settlement layer for everyday transactions rather than the direct vehicle for the proverbial cup of coffee purchase. Neither Bitcoin is Bitcoin anymore.
We’re all just cryptos now
We’ve come to that uncomfortable point in cryptocurrency’s journey where Bitcoin has irrevocably lost the one thing that made it Bitcoin: its original purity. Now, rather than the one serious coin blessed by Satoshi himself, it’s just a couple extra altcoins. In fact, that term has lost all meaning. We’re all altcoins now. Embrace it.
Bitcoin proved the concept. Now the test run is over, and it’s just two of many coins vying for dominance against a host of competitors. Welcome to the Thunderdome, may the best coin win.
Very nice write up ! I do believe it will be good (hard) lesson none the less, that will make crypto stronger in the end. I also thought when I heard about bitcoin cash the first time, “Really, is bitcoin trowing the game so DASH can win ?”
If a crypto investor/user was beamed down and presented with nothing but the name/facts/roadmap of each organization, it would be interesting to see where the standings would be going forward. Just being first and/or having the largest market cap explains today, but doesn’t guide the future. Many an organization has lead their industry (cars, TVs, computers, internet), only to vanish when the market matured. I suspect it had to do with lacking a future vision and/or the governance to make it happen.
You surely didn’t think so a week ago when BTC successfully locked-in BIP91. If BTC Cash was worth anything, then I would agree, but it is just a shit coin that brings 0 added value by some insolent fucker who doesn’t just make his own coin, he wants to chain split. He could do it any time, years ago. But he chose the timing now, so he can cause as much confusion as possible so he can make as much money as possible. I want him to fail miserably.
I don’t want anybody to simply fail, but to stand on their own merit. Coin, business, government, individual. If one individual can up-end an entire eco-system, then I wouldn’t want to have my wealth parked there. Better to have it with an organization that has a strong voting governance in place (Dash, Decred, etc…). As it stands, the only voting I get with BTC’s future is whether I actually hold it or not. That’s a pretty easy, but crude, voting system too.
BIP 91 is a scam, similar to segwit, the fact that scam and politics has become the daily norm in bitcoin community indicated that it has irreversibly corrupted
And the overwhelming majority of Bitcoin owners supported it… Probably you are a scam too 🙂
Buttcoin is going to be dead in 3 years. Just relax and buy Dash and Etherum. They are not trash like BTC. I won’t value it a penny more than $100. BTC should off itself into a museum 😛
hahaha LOOOL. You don’t understand how economics and innovation works in all human history, do you? Talking about BTC. On the other hand – what are you grunting exactly? Dash privacy for its masternodes that can easily get under feds control any time of the day? Or ETH, apart from it being hacked 5 times a month…that there are already much better platforms in the works? Bitcoin is like Gold. It may be old tech from current point of view, but it is great for what it is – store of value, it has improved a lot since its earliest days and will now add Segwit, then comes the Lightning network and whatnot in sidechains. I have seen many articles from “great” analysts announcing BTC dead, but the first time a comment from a random n00b in a forum calling BTC names, forgetting what brought him that much money in crypto in the first place. Disrespect won’t move you forward, kid.
” Dash privacy for its masternodes that can easily get under feds control any time of the day?”
Good luck with that. No coin is NSA proof, kid.
n00b? seriously! you are talking to someone who put all of his life’s saving on Buttcoin on July 31st, converted them into BCH, tripled my life’s savings and went right back to Dash and Etherum on August 2nd.
I don’t know what kind of a brain damaged retard calls someone who triple his money under 48hours a n00b.
You should probably go back to one of those Safe Spaces :p
I’ve tripled my money in less than 15 minutes in this game. $XVG
Wow! That’s epic. Best bull run I’ve been in was Monaco doing 435% in 24 hours. Happy trading. Let the best currency win. Blockchain needs no store of value. It needs utility. XVG has that.
No they don’t. A small ardent group of astroturfers has spent the last 2 years trying to create that impression. So far it seems to be working as some people still think SW/LN isn’t actually “off-chain tx processing monopoly run by banks”… That’s what it is. If you doubt it, look up “AXA” “Blockstream” “Lightning Network” and “patents”
Like him or not Roger Ver is trying to keep the bankers from taking Bitcoin from us. I know it’s been spun a million ways to sunday, but that is what Bitcoin Cash is all about. Bitcoin without shitwit.
If you did that you’d find out that a solid 60% of all projects in crypto have been infiltrated by former bankers/and/or are at least partially owned by existing legacy finance organizations (with options to assume full-ownership in the event of “reasons”).
Not going to lie my friend this is the most ridiculously uneducated and retarded article that I have ever read in my entire existence. Absolutely atrocious usage of Clickbait on the title. Awful
Agreed… And melodramatic, lordy was it melodramatic…
Great rebuttal …not
I don’t think Crypto was ever a sentiment project, two for the price of one if the split sticks, but I don’t believe in Crypto because it will never pay my pension, Bitcoin is basically barter at best or a pyramid selling at worst, but it has no end in sight because it represents a political movement, China gave it it’s leg up for that reason and will do so again, I think it’s the first ever successful anarchist project Bitcoin will stay out in front because the anarchists have got the power and they know if Bitcoin gives way to Ether Bright Bart is moving in.
facepalm
Give the poor guy a break. We need these kind of useful idiots. If it wasn’t for these kind of people, I wouldn’t have tripled my money on the fork that attempted to sort of take care of something that better products have already taken care of.
Just look at ETH/ETC fork, since everyone can make a fork, this is definitely going to happen sooner or later, as long as the devs are not true to the original vision of Satoshi. In fact since Satoshi left, no one knows what is the original vision, and it does not matter either once politics and power grabbing has entered the picture because of the high value of the network
“In fact since Satoshi left, no one knows what is the original vision,”
his whitepaper is pretty clear.
“In other words, “We got it right the first time, don’t mess it up with useless experiments.”” Here is the thing. WE DIDN’T GET IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME!!! I know, I was there. We got most of the way the first time, but it took a few adjustments before we got to the Bitcoin we know and love today. I’d also like to point out that network congestion was solved via INCREASING THE BLOCK-SIZE last time. As a matter of fact, it worked so well, that if we had hard-baked block-size increases to happen along with REWARD HALVENINGS, we wouldn’t even be in this situation.
We are here because the banks want their monopoly over digital tx processing back. That is why Segregated Witness. That is why Lightning Network. Both are bricks on the path back to exactly that, off-chain txing monopolized by banks and other legacy finance organizations….